|

"When
CEOs such as Bill Gates say that education outweighs tax
incentives, states should take note. A talented workforce
is an economic development tool that rivals any tax incentive
program, and that is where we need to focus our efforts.
"
-- Economist Alan Essig
|
Alan Essig
Georgia
economist
October 2005
Overview: In this October interview with the Center for
a Better South, Georgia economist Alan Essig talks about what Southern
states can do to improve their financial positions through modernizing
tax codes, investing in education and closing corporate loopholes.
Essig is founding director of the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute
in Atlanta, Ga.
BETTER SOUTH: Before Hurricane Katrina, Southern states faced
strapped budgets in the short-term and structural deficits over
the long-term, unless something is done to fix them. Now that Louisiana,
Mississippi and Alabama -- along with other Southern states -- are
facing numerous challenges wrought by the hurricane, what can state
lawmakers do to strengthen their state's financial position?
ALAN ESSIG: Even before Hurricane Katrina, many Southern
states faced structural gaps between revenues and expenditures.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities listed Florida, South
Carolina and Tennessee as states most at risk of a structural budget
deficit. Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky and Mississippi were close behind.
With the tax base of Louisiana and Mississippi directly impacted
by the destruction of Hurricane Katrina and neighboring Southern
states impacted by the expense of thousands of evacuees needing
state services, structural deficits become even more of an issue.
Southern state legislators can take action in several ways to assure
the fiscal and budgetary integrity of their states. First, it is
more important than ever to assure that state funds are spent as
efficiently and effectively as possible. Whether it is modernizing
procurement or demanding program accountability, states must assure
taxpayers that revenues are spent wisely. A dollar wasted on the
inefficient purchasing of pens is a dollar we could be spending
on educating our children.
Second, it is time to modernize state tax codes. Most state tax
systems were put in place between 1930 and 1950. While the tax system
has changed little in 60 years, the economy has changed a great
deal. The tax system must be reformed to allow states to collect
sufficient revenues in order to make the investments that a modern
and growing 21st century state needs. Specifically the sales tax
base can broadened and made relevant to the modern economy, and
the corporate income tax can be strengthened by closing loopholes.
BETTER SOUTH: For a long time, the South attracted industries
based on cheap labor, cheap land and cheap power. With the Mexicos,
Chinas and Malaysias of the world, those days are over in a global
economy. But to many in political power, they don't seem to get
it that the "Don't Tax and They Will Come" philosophy
no longer works. Talk some more about this and outline what will
work.
|
ABOUT
ALAN ESSIG
Alan Essig
is the founding Executive Director of the Georgia Budget
and Policy Institute (http://www.gbpi.org).
He focuses on overall budget and revenue issues, as well as
healthcare. His prior professional experience includes serving
as a senior research associate with the Fiscal Research Center
of the Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State
University, where he undertook policy research in regards
to state budget policy and process, health and social welfare
issues and taxes. Essig also served in the Georgia governor's
office as deputy policy director where he helped develop policies
in the areas of Medicaid, public health, mental health and
developmental disabilities, child welfare and aging. Essig
has a bachelor's degree History from the State University
of New York at Buffalo, and a master's degree in public administration
from the State University of New York at Albany.
|
ESSIG: State economic development policy must shift to a
policy of ensuring an educated and trained workforce to attract
businesses that offer the quality jobs of the 21st century. Southern
states are not competing with each other for jobs as much as they
are competing with China, India and Eastern Europe. As pointed out
in a report issued by the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute titled,
"Don't Tax and They Will Come: The Questionable Link Between
Corporate Income Taxes and Economic Development," a quality
workforce has a greater impact on the creation of quality jobs than
the level of state taxation.
Economic development should focus on growing good jobs with livable
wages and benefits for all residents. If the goals of economic development
are people-focused, then the economic development tools should be
as well. Bill Gates recently told an NCSL panel, "Again, I
go back to education as really trumping all other things."
When CEOs such as Bill Gates say that education outweighs tax incentives,
states should take note.
A talented workforce is an economic development tool that rivals
any tax incentive program, and that is where we need to focus our
efforts. To compete with the Mexicos, Chinas and Malaysias of the
world, Southern states need to produce more scientists, engineers
and mathematicians.
Beyond education, there should be strategic investments in areas
of greatest need. Certain areas require targeted spending to correct
market imperfections and prepare those distressed communities for
economic growth. Investments are needed in basic transportation
and communication infrastructure, as well as job training. Where
discretionary spending on economic development is appropriate, such
spending should be tied to strong accountability principles such
as wage and health care standards.
BETTER SOUTH: All of what you're talking about costs money.
Can these investments be made without increasing taxes too much?
And how?
ESSIG: Much of these needed investments can be made by redirecting
funds currently spent on tax expenditures and by closing corporate
tax loopholes. Most Southern states are expending hundreds of millions
of dollars on tax breaks and incentives to businesses in the name
of "economic development" and job growth. This economic
development policy has not proven to be effective. It would be a
much more effective and would have a greater long-term impact to
instead invest those funds in human and physical capital (education,
job training, infrastructure). States are also losing hundreds of
millions of dollars through corporations that avoid their state
tax obligations. The closing of corporate loopholes would help enable
states to make needed investments in education and infrastructure.
BETTER SOUTH: Don't a lot of Southern states exempt a lot of
stuff from sales tax? Seems like if they would broaden the sales
tax base, they would generate additional revenues without raising
rates -- and might even be able to drop rates....Is this a good
strategy and are there other things like this?
ESSIG: Most Southern states tax very few services. As the
economy continues to move from manufacturing to services, the goods-focused
sales tax will continue to decline as a percentage of the economy.
The declining sales tax is making it more difficult for states to
fund the growing education and health care expenses. Broadening
the sales tax base to include household services would increase
state revenues by hundreds of millions of dollars. If raising revenues
is not the goal, broadening the base would allow states to lower
the sales tax rate. Either goal would result in improved tax policy.
Southern states should work with their congressional delegation
to allow for the taxation of Internet sales, which are growing each
year. The lack of a sales tax on Internet sales puts businesses
located within a state at a competitive disadvantage. In Georgia,
for example, it is estimated that Internet sales have cost the state
treasury as much as $400 million per year with that number growing
every year. Once again, if raising revenues is not the policy goal,
taxing Internet sales would allow states to lower the sales tax
rate.
BETTER SOUTH: If you were King of Southern Legislatures and
could do three things to improve the South, what would you do?
ESSIG: First and most important is to improve education.
The South trails the nation in most education outcomes. We must
be willing to invest what is necessary in primary and secondary
education to bring Southern states at least to the national average.
In fact, excellence in education should be the ultimate goal.
Second, we must implement policies to ameliorate poverty, especially
among children. The South has many of the most severe pockets of
poverty in the country. Part of the solution is related to education.
Improved education for all citizens of the South is the most cost-effective,
long-term economic development strategy. In the short term, a strong
social safety net is vitally important. It is morally repugnant
that in the year 2005, children in the South still lack adequate
food, housing, and healthcare.
Third, we must reform and modernize state tax systems. State tax
systems must be made relevant to the 21st century economy. To make
the needed investments in education and to strengthen the social
safety net, tax systems must be developed that can fairly and equitably
raise the necessary revenues.
© 2005, Center for a Better South.
* * *
If you'd like to receive Better South news updates by email, please
send us an email today.
|